![' "Longer Telegram" | To Counter China’s Rise, the U.S. Should Focus on Xi'](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5a3e922cf6b9a40001bc2d70/60be80b4b52bc60098231e59_2_8dVxkqccahKYcmCmvYSTl72eJkfbmt4t8yenImKBWpnB4YU4myT9-8UqDpoJyK.png)
A strategy that focuses more narrowly on Xi, rather than the CCP as a whole, presents a more achievable objective.'
Read the entire 'Longer Telegram'
‘China under Xi, unlike under previous leaders Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao, is no longer a status quo power.’
- ‘It has become what the international-relations world calls a revisionist power, a state bent on changing the world around it.
‘For the United States, its allies and the US-led liberal international order, this represents a fundamental shift.’
- ‘Xi is no longer just a problem for U.S. primacy.’
- ‘He now presents a serious challenge to the whole of the democratic world.’
‘Washington’s difficulty in developing an effective China strategy lies in the absence of a clearly understood strategic objective.’
- ‘At present, objectives articulated by various officials range from inducing Chinese economic reform through a limited trade war to full-blown regime change that focuses on overthrowing the Communist Party.’
- ‘So what should this objective be—and what understanding of China is it based on?’
‘The present challenge will require a qualitatively different and more granular policy response to China than the blunt instrument of “containment with Chinese characteristics” and a dream of CCP collapse.’
- ‘In fact, indulgence in politically appealing calls for the overthrow of the 91 million-member CCP as a whole is strategically self-defeating.’
- ‘Such an approach only strengthens Xi’s hand as it enables him to circle elite political and popular nationalist wagons in defense of both party and country.’
‘In contrast, a strategy that focuses more narrowly on Xi, rather than the CCP as a whole, presents a more achievable objective—and also points to policies that serve to weaken rather than embolden his autocratic leadership in the process.’